This thing has, on three different Windows PCs using three different major web browsers, consistently slowed down my transactions with every web page in which it is embedded. You, Sir or Madam, need a slap in the face and the clear understanding that super-duper advertisements bursting with interactivity will never outweigh the simple necessity of being able to browse the Internet without waiting for your fucking code to load.
It also proves to me your boss is incompetent, because that’s the moron who approved the deployment of this thing. Did anyone test it? Did anyone see how it acted in Windows XP with more than a gig of RAM on Opera with a 3GHz Pentium IV chip? How about a crappy Dell laptop from 2002 running Firefox? Please, please take the ad down. Nice idea: terrible execution. hari88
I clicked on “AdChoice” and I was taken to this page:
We may use information we have about you to make sure that the ads you see, on the eBay site or elsewhere, are as relevant to you as we can make them. We think these relevant AdChoice ads will personalize and improve your eBay experience. Any information we use for AdChoice follows the eBay Privacy Policy.
Listen up, Ebay: customer service means first and foremost not ticking off people who aren’t even using your company’s goods and services. People who are, in fact, not even remotely doing anything related to your company.
If nothing else, stop placing the ad in web-based e-mail like Yahoo!
Cholesterol Secret – Coffee Habits That Make The Difference – According to the association of the American Heart, a very big survey has been led on nearly 120,000 people in the United States that have been followed for between 14 and 20 years. People answered with care the questions about how much coffee they drink and so or they didn’t have all symptoms of the disease.
Many cups of coffee on wooden background
And the heart that the answer was dramatically that clear:
People that drank as many six cups of coffee one day, against people who drank less that a cup one month, didn’t show to any difference in the frequency of heart illness. The lovers of coffee can drink fearless to increase their risk of heart illness. Note that the aforementioned survey is based on people who drink drop or coffee papier-filtré that are fundamentally how American prepares this drink. The filters of the paper appear to remove cholesterol-chatty substances undesirable found in the beans. https://3.79.236.213/
We coffee cannot conclude the same for those that drink non filtered or boiled coffee yet. To use a French Press typically is prepared to non filtered coffee or is brought to boil and served directly no more than that far filtering through paper. Therefore, it could have considerable differences there in the chemical composition of coffee non filtered compared to it of its counterpart.
Meanwhile papier-filtré, the other studies discovered this coffee has anti-inflammatory and properties of the antioxidant that could reduce the risk of some cancers, diabetes and illness of heart. Does the drink also tend to hurry the passage of waste through the digestive extent, therefore maybe reduced the risk of colon cancer as well.
So is coffee good or bad? Well, it depends on the consumed amount, our habits and lifestyle:
– Where possible, choose coffee filtered instead of French-Hurried or boiled;
– Demand for cool brewing by opposition to immediate coffee;
– coffee of the Drink with your meals, not on an empty stomach. It is healthier for your stomach and would also limit your hold to three cups a day;
– Avoid coffee at least three hours therefore before the time of bed you can take a rest the of a good night again; and
– Shows your body for signs of discomfort. If you feel symptoms of agitation, the palpitation, the difficulty that lowers sleepy, abdominal pain or irregular intestines if it pleases you or your consumption of caffeine. Caffeine is in coffee, tea, drinks without alcohol, chocolate and the good of some nuts.
It to know that something as simple as to drink coffee can help lower our risk of cancer, diabetes, and illness of heart. However, while prepared coffee freshly is a source concentrated of antioxidants, this cannot be a substitute for bays, legumes, walnuts, and other fruits and vegetables that provide some antioxidants with a wide range of vitamins, protective compounds, and dietary fiber.
Leg Press Machine: Compact, Durable And Effective – If you’re in need of a good workout machine for building up the muscles in your legs, having a leg press machine can be really useful for improving your overall lower body strength as well as to build muscles in the lower body such as the hamstrings, quadriceps and the gluteus maximus.
There are basically two different types of leg press machines: the normal horizontal leg press and the 45-degree leg press. Most leg press machines are constructed as either a sled angled at 45 degrees or a lever. They are especially valuable for anyone who needs to recover from his or her injuries because you can perform exercises which only involve moving light weights and you can limit the ranges of motion with it. www.mustangcontracting.com
Indeed, leg press machines are compound exercise equipments which are commonly used in weight training. They have counter-weights that gravitate towards the legs and provide resistance when pushed. You may be loading 500 pounds, but your muscles will only feel 250 pounds. Since your body is stationary inside of the machine and you’re simply pressing a sled, neuromuscular stimulation is not nearly as high as that of the squat but it still makes for a great leg exercise.
Regardless, leg press machine is still of the most popular pieces of equipment in the gym and it is very effective for the accelerated development of quads, hamstrings, calves and glutes without putting unnecessary stress on your lower back. The range of motion is less than that of a squat, but it is a safer way if you are working out alone.
It is important to that while using a home leg press machine without a trainer to guide you; you need to be careful not to bend your knees too deeply. This is because if you do so, your pelvis will tilt and your lower back will begin to take over, When that happens, you will risk straining your lower back muscles and cause damage to your spinal discs.
Most leg press machines have to ability to adjust to various positions so that you can work out different the muscle group of your legs at various levels of tension. In fact, you can also strengthen and tone the muscles of your abs with certain exercises.
If you’re planning to get a leg press machine which you can use in the privacy of your own home, you want to choose one with a compact design so that you can maximize your workout space without causing your home to be more crowded. Be sure to choose one that has an adjustable seat so that other members of your family can use it too.
Comfort and durability are also two very important factors that you need to consider before making the final buying decision. Believe it or not, some models are so well built that they are confident enough to offer you a lifetime warranty!…
Pepperfry & fab for furnish – Amazon does not focus on the furniture, but there are dedicated sites who love to sell furniture for those whose needs are different.
One of the benefits you get from using online portals that you can assemble and disassemble the furniture. There are installation charges, and if you don’t like the product, then you can just place a return order. bandar ceme – https://www.mustangcontracting.com/
Amazon.com or International – Not every site would work out for you, so why don’t you begin with the E-commerce giant has sellers who can deliver products from one country to another, if you have any specific requirements.
Amazon is the E-commerce giant, and many top brands target these sites because of the number of people who use it. ceme online – americandreamdrivein.com
Many consumers do not realize that you cannot begin unless you know what you want and what your needs are. You don’t have to be an expert at this. Ask your parents or family for suggestions and tons of idea will hit your mind and you can see from your family perceptive.
Amazon.com or International
Not every site would work out for you, so why don’t you begin with the E-commerce giant has sellers who can deliver products from one country to another, if you have any specific requirements. Amazon is the E-commerce giant, and many top brands target these sites because of the number of people who use it. idn play
Pepperfry & fab furfurnish
Amazon does not focus on the furniture, but there are dedicated sites who love to sell furniture for those whose needs are different. One of the benefits you get from using online portals that you can assemble and disassemble the furniture. There are installation charges, and if you don’t like the product, then you can just place a return order. https://americandreamdrivein.com/
eBay Worldwide
eBay is one of the popular site in the world, who has started as Auction site then later become an E-commerce giant. eBay is not bad unless you have shopping experience on eBay. If you are using it the first time, then I wouldn’t recommend you to shop on eBay.
UrbanLadder
I have personally used this portal for unique furniture and I must agree that many of the products are unique but the prices are the concern because they are overrated and overpriced furniture but no compromise in quality.
Conclusion
There is no doubt that i have provided you sources which are known for quality and easy returns policy Ecommerce websites. Share you experience on the E-commerce we have mentioned, it will be helpful for other fellow users.
“I like to say that the new energy technologies could be the largest economic opportunity of the 21st century,” [John Doerr from the big Silicon Valley venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins] explained.[…]
Twenty large, well-known companies have quietly bought and are testing Bloom boxes in California. idnplay
Like FedEx. We were at their hub in Oakland, the day Bloom installed their boxes, each one costing $700-800,000.
One reason the companies have signed up is that in California 20 percent of the cost is subsidized by the state, and there’s a 30 percent federal tax break because it’s a “green” technology. In other words: the price is cut in half. www.americannamedaycalendar.com
From my selfish, I’ve-got-mine, coldhearted, stubborn, unrealistic viewpoint, I think the real story here is how the federal tax system is getting in the way of serious next-gen technology that could radically improve living standards. There’s the lede, buried as usual.
Don’t take this as something it isn’t. Don’t let someone tell you that a 30% cut in federal taxes has helped make this technology possible. If they say that, they’ve got their cause and effect mixed up. The government didn’t help anyone or help do anything.
A more accurate way of explaining it is 30% of the dollar cost the government aggressively imposes on individuals (and the organizations they own) who add economic value to human existence has been temporarily waived per conditional government approval. The line between economically feasible and a waste of money is thin enough that a third less in this expense makes a difference. This tech might revolutionize world well-being, and for some companies, a few hundred thousand bucks are part of what stands in the way.
Think about that for a minute. Think about the number of people with great ideas, promising implementations, and the willpower to face the risks. Think about the diverse level of interest in improving humanity out there, trying to make It work. Think about the thousands of decisions made each day, many with the weight of cost factoring in at the moment of truth. Most people can’t buy whatever they want; they have to spend wisely or go broke. This is no different from an organization designed to create and manufacture a product.
“This is affordable. Yes, we should do it.”
…or…
“We’d never make any money. No, we shouldn’t do it.”
I think of the untold, unpublished, unrecognized, uncountable mountains of “no” built up over the decades, a mute chain on human progress. I’m no utilitarian and I don’t think the critical determinant of any moral question is the amount, degree, or breadth of some positive outcome. But if those are the grounds upon which someone argues for the aggression necessary to enforce the tax system against people trying to voluntarily buy and sell goods and services, they have no legitimate reason to claim this statism made the Bloom Box possible. The government decided to let these people keep more of their money. That isn’t helping just like a robber isn’t helping you when he decides to leave the TV.
Actually, the robber analogy isn’t a great fit. The robber doesn’t normally return at an arbitrary time to claim your TV, knowing you will be held criminally responsible if you attempt to prevent him from taking it. Criminally responsible, of course, means specially-trained and well-armed people who have substantial legal immunity will eventually arrest, kidnap, and kill you for resisting their orders.
I predict many of the coercive collectivists known as politicians will praise this as an example of proper government policy. I predict I’ll vomit a little in my mouth every time I hear it, knowing that some dolt claiming to be a supporter of free markets and individual liberty will be on shortly to concede away the former by compromising on the latter.…
Unemployment Benefits – A Thought Experiment – Jeffrey Carlson of Grand Rapids, Mich., a former insurance salesman and father of six, says he is motivated to find work, despite the $1,650 a month he collects in unemployment benefits.
That money does not go far given his rent, child support, utilities and credit card bills. Carlson, 44, said he has applied for numerous jobs with no luck and has spent $40,000 in savings. poker 99
Carlson, who made $50,000 a year before he was laid off, said watching Bunning and other senators debate whether to extend unemployment benefits was painful and infuriating. https://www.americannamedaycalendar.com/
“I paid into the system for 25 years and now I need it,” he said. “People are being put through the emotional heartache and anxiety of not knowing if it’s going to keep coming. There are too many people who need it and are depending on it.”
2010 The Washington Post Company
I don’t know the specifics and details of the federal-state unemployment insurance system. My brief glimpses of it from my job are unpleasant enough. However, assume for a moment that Mr. Carlson did indeed “pay into” a system for 25 years with the expectation that he would be able to withdraw from it when he needed the money.
Why the hell didn’t he just set up a private savings account, deposit the money there, and know it would stay safe no matter what happened? Having done that, he’d be assured of the following:
It would always be his money, rightfully earned.
It would be immediately accessible and traceable.
It would be easily inherited by his family if he died.
It would be available to use in case of an unexpected emergency and not limited to unemployment situations.
Given a large enough balance and a decent bank rate, he might earn substantial interest.
If the alternative to the above is a politicized, unaccountable, and completely out-of-his-hands system…why would anyone take the government option? How could you live knowing strangers are operating your safety net and are liable to change its terms and conditions arbitrarily? Why subject yourself to the spectacle of some hack grandstanding on your future a thousand miles away?
I can tell you a few reasons.
One, because the government option isn’t really an option. It’s based on a tax and taxes are not optional. You or your employer are forced to pay into the system. If those payments are not made, the fifty-ton bureaucratic paper grinder lurches into operation with the expressed ultimate intent of physically seizing individuals and their assets to punish noncompliance. That grinder is the sole reason why I pay taxes. I don’t want to be arrested and I don’t want my property stolen outright.
Two, because most people are counting on that state aggression to force participation. These folks either won’t or can’t save for themselves and are expecting the government option to provide where they cannot. They embrace the Sicilian Mafia phrase pagare tutti, pagare meno. Because those who would not voluntarily pay are threatened with violence if they do not, many people pay less than they normally would if they were acting responsibly. Since they don’t have to deal with hundreds of thousands of individuals gritting their teeth over the taxes and all they have to do is sign up for the money (often after receiving government-paid training to learn how to sign up for the money!), what’s not to like?
Three, because some people actually swallow the political swindle hook, line, and sinker. They are akin to the knowing group above, but differ from those folks because they trust the person claiming to represent them and they trust the talking heads filling in the rhetorical details. Flag-waving, democratic glory-blindness, or raw egalitarianism; not really important which one.
Four, because some people are simply too irresponsible, busy, ignorant, or shallow of thought to even consider a diversified savings plan. It’s just another vague thought-cloud in the back of their minds competing with their next case of Bud Light, what to cook for dinner inbetween picking up the kids and finding a plumber for the sink, whether human evolution is real, and what the heck is up with those brown foreign people fighting with each other all the time. Retirement and building an emergency fund? Oh, yeah, get right on that…mmm, reality TV…*slouch*
All the planning I do starts with the assumption the government will not give me a penny. Not a penny of the money it threatened out of me for decades and not a penny threatened out of anyone else.
Even excluding my sarcastic egoist anarchism, this doesn’t seem like such a radical concept. My confusion is doubled when people are already “paying into” a government system and therefore can already afford to set aside a portion of their money to take care of themselves. This isn’t even an unemployment thing. It applies to any situation where you face an uncertain future with a non-wealthy income.
Adding a $1 per pack tax to cigarettes could raise more than $9 billion a year for states, health advocates said on Wednesday, and a poll released with the study shows Americans would support such a tax.
I wonder if there will ever come a day when I or someone who shares my philosophical temperament will encounter a mainstream news article like the above and not immediately know how it will proceed. poker99
“An increase in tobacco tax rates is not only sound public health policy but a smart and predictable way to help boost the economy and generate long-term health savings for states facing deepening budget deficits,” said John Seffrin, chief executive of the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network. pafikebasen.org
I loathe these people. They take a laudable goal and fuck it up by advocating the violent redistribution of property as a way to achieve it.
“We have irrefutable evidence that raising the tobacco tax lowers smoking rates among adults and deters millions of children from picking up their first cigarette,” Seffrin said in a statement.
Pragmatism: It Can Justify Anything
The groups also surveyed 847 registered voters and found 60 percent favor raising the tobacco tax to help state budgets while 38 percent were opposed.The survey, with a margin of error of three points, found that 72 percent of voters opposed increases in state sales and 80 percent rejected higher gasoline taxes.
Democracy: Danger In Numbers
“Each year in the United States, smoking-caused disease results in $96 billion in health care costs, much of which is paid by taxpayers through higher insurance premiums and government-funded health programs such as Medicaid,” the report argues”Indeed, higher Medicaid costs are one of the reasons states are facing budget difficulties.”
OBVIOUSLY WE CAN’T STOP TAXING OTHERS TO PAY FOR THOSE TREATMENTS. THAT WOULD BE MEAN AND HEARTLESS.
Rather, let’s just order cops to threaten imminent bodily harm, abduction, and detainment against those retailers who won’t collect the tax and who, after their permission to make a living is revoked, continue to operate their businesses. Let’s send strangers violently into the lives of people who have done nothing wrong and command them to raise their prices with the express intent to cut down on their sales. All of that is fine and dandy, isn’t it?
“It is disheartening the report’s authors are suggesting legislators position tax increases as a way to address health issues while the report clearly describes tax increases as a way to fix budgets and score political points with voters,” Philip Morris USA said in a statement.”The report neglects to mention the fact that cigarette tax increases rarely generate all of the revenue they are projected to raise — creating more budget problems down the road.”
Copyright Š 2010 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved.
And bringing up the rear: the inevitable half-hearted, nutless whining by Industry. Utterly devoid of principle and morally gutted by years of lies, the best they can offer is “I disagree, that plan wouldn’t quite work so well.” I once had some sympathy for these cretins; no more. Not when they say shit like:
In addition to violating many trademark laws, counterfeit cigarettes are almost always sold without the appropriate federal and state excise tax. The counterfeit cigarettes purchased from G.J. Smokes bore no genuine tax stamp. As a result, the applicable excise taxes were not paid.
If you actively advocate the economic destruction of your products, how the fuck am I supposed to care about another buck imposed on top of each pack? Other than the unthinkingly reflexive tea party hordes, why would anyone else give it a second thought unless it was their own habit gored by the government ox?
How Dare You Call It Socialism! – Short of making the most difficult economic changes, however, there is the matter that even blue-dog Democrats ought to be able to handle without flinching: establishing the government as employer of last resort.[…]
There is no natural rate of unemployment. But there is a natural – that is, fundamental – right to work. The social and economic costs of unemployment – lost income, crime, broken families, physical and mental health problems, interrupted educations, shattered retirements, social unrest – ought to be plenty to make providing full employment a slam dunk for politicians supposedly in tune with their constituents. pokerasia
Why, it’s simply beyond the boundaries of polite discussion! The government employing everyone? Silly reactionary, don’t you know that socialism only exists when the state does everything? https://pafikebasen.org/
Once again, Meteor Blades demonstrates he knows jack shit about economics.
